Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-04-19 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 197.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than the Moto G6, with a 97.6 score against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy Fold is a newer and somewhat thinner phone than Moto G6, although it is extremely heavier. Galaxy Fold has a little faster processor than Moto G6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto G6 features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels count in each inch of screen. The Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G6, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Fold has a very superior battery lifetime than Moto G6, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G6, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a 0.39 inches camera sensor and the same resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has higher video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture for better captures in low-light situations.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G6. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Moto G6, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.