Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-04-19 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 197.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30 is much better than the Motorola Moto G6, getting a general score of 82.4 against 72.1. The Samsung Galaxy M30 is a a bit heavier phone than Motorola Moto G6, but they are 0.33inches thick. The Moto G6 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixels amount per display inch.
Galaxy M30 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G6, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M30 features a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy M30 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy M30 has a way better battery duration than Moto G6, because it has a 67 percent more battery capacity. Motorola Moto G6 takes slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a camera with a lower 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.