Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is way better than the Moto G6's 72.1 general score. Galaxy Note 20 is a somewhat heavier cellphone than the Moto G6, but both have the same thickness. Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better processing unit than Moto G6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 and Motorola Moto G6 both count with incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy Note 20 has a just a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G6, and although they both have the same aperture and a same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G6, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Note 20 has a much better battery life than Motorola Moto G6, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G6. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 20, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto G6, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.