Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Moto G6's overall score of 72.1. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is notably newer and a bit thinner than Moto G6's, but it is also somewhat heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more vivid screen than Moto G6, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a larger screen and a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each display inch.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G6, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior hardware performance than Moto G6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G6, because it has a 50 percent larger battery capacity. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality and a camera with way more MP.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than the Moto G6, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.