Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2018-04-19 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a score of 80.4, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G6's overall score of 72.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a just a bit thinner phone than Motorola Moto G6, but they have the same weight. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a slightly better screen than Moto G6, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G6, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 256 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto G6 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a tinier camera sensor providing a lower image quality, they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same video definition and the same video frame rates. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G6, because it has a 7 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Note Fan Edition, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G6, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.