Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2018-04-19 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a lot better than the Moto G6, with a overall score of 89 against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a a little thinner cellphone than Moto G6, but both weight 5.89oz. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has 5 GB more RAM.
Motorola Moto G6 and Samsung Galaxy Note10 count with really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit inferior pixels quantity in each screen inch, it also counts with a little larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280. The Galaxy Note10 features much more storage to install applications and games than Moto G6, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto G6, and although they both have the same video definition, a 12 mega-pixels resolution camera and a 0.39 inches sensor, the Galaxy Note10 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and video and better 60 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy Note10 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Moto G6, because it has a 17 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G6. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola Moto G6, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.