Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2018-04-19 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a global score of 80.2, which is better than the Motorola Moto G6's score of 72.1. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy Note5 is notably older and a little bit heavier than Motorola Moto G6, it's body is still just a little thinner. The Galaxy Note5 features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note5 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note5 has a bit better looking screen than Moto G6, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Note5 also has a quite better screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Moto G6 counts with a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note5, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a slightly better camera than Moto G6, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor giving a lower image quality and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photographs in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Note5 also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Note5 has a battery life that's just as good as the Motorola Moto G6 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.