Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G6, getting a 98 score against 72.1. Even though Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is newer than Motorola Moto G6, it is heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better screen than Moto G6, because it has a larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a quite higher screen pixel density. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior camera than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a back-facing camera with much more MP and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater storage for applications and games than Moto G6, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than Moto G6, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G6. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto G6, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.