Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-19 | -- |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 5.89 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is much better than the Moto G6, getting an 82.6 score against 72.1. The Galaxy S25 design is much thinner and way lighter than the Moto G6. The Galaxy S25 counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G6, because although it has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bigger screen.
Moto G6 has a way better performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy S25 features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G6, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a greater camera than Moto G6, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a lot higher video definition, a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality photographs and a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera. The Galaxy S25 has greater battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G6, because it has a 33 percent more battery size.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G6. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy S25, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G6, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.