Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2013-03-14 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Polycarbonate |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S4 has a score of 76.1, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G6's global score of 72.1. Galaxy S4 is an incredibly older phone than Motorola Moto G6, but it's just a little bit thinner and notably lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy S4 features a little faster processor than Moto G6, because although it has 4 less cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy S4 features a much better display than Moto G6, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher display density. The Moto G6 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S4, because although it has a lesser MP back camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Moto G6 has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S4, because it has 32 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 128 GB. Moto G6 features a bit better battery life than Galaxy S4, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S4 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.