Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.1 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G6, having a 77.8 score against 72.1. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport design is just a bit lighter than the Motorola Moto G6, but it's a little bit thicker and was released many years before. The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto G6, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and 4 less CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a sharper display than Moto G6, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater screen pixels density. The Galaxy S5 Sport's camera is very similar to Motorola Moto G6's camera, because although the Galaxy S5 Sport has a smaller aperture and a tinier sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, it also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution.
The Motorola Moto G6 counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB, the Motorola Moto G6 also has more internal storage capacity. Moto G6 features a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G6, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.