Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 197.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G6's global score of 72.1. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer device than the Motorola Moto G6, although it is a lot thicker and noticeably heavier. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto G6, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher display density. Motorola Moto G6 has a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same resolution back camera and the same sensor size, the Motorola Moto G6 also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much greater memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G6, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way better battery duration than Moto G6, because it has a 50% more battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G6. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto G6, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.