Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is much better than Motorola Moto G6's 72.1 score. Although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is newer than Motorola Moto G6, it is somewhat thicker and notably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover Pro and Moto G6 both have very similar screens, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite worse display pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro and Motorola Moto G6 both feature incredibly similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G6, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Moto G6, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Moto G6, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.