Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 197.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G6's global score of 72.1. Galaxy Z Flip is a newer and thinner phone than the Motorola Moto G6, although it is a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better screen than Moto G6, because it has a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a little higher pixels amount in each screen inch and a larger screen.
Galaxy Z Flip features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip shoots a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels camera in the back, a F1.8 diafragm aperture, a 0.39 inches back camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy Z Flip also has higher video frame rate. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Moto G6, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Moto G6, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.