Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 197.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Moto G6, getting a global score of 94.6 against 72.1. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much heavier than the Moto G6, it's thinner and also extremely newer. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a display that is very similar to the Moto G6 one, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit lower pixels quantity in each display inch, it also counts with a way larger screen and a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a better processor than Moto G6, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 9 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has better video frame rate and a way larger sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G6, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G6. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto G6, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.