Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 197.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is way better than the Motorola Moto G6, getting a overall score of 90.6 against 72.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a a lot newer and a lot thinner device than the Motorola Moto G6, although it's also way heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory.
Moto G6 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density. Moto G6 features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the Moto G6 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G6, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a really longer battery performance than Moto G6, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.