Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-19 | -- |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 197.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a global score of 91.1, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G6's 72.1 general score. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's design is extremely heavier but way thinner than Motorola Moto G6. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G6, because although it has a bit lower quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a better resolution of 1968 x 2184 and a really bigger display.
The Moto G6 features a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 13 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition also has a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G6, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto G6, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G6. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G6, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.