Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than Moto G60, getting an 80 score against 79.5. Google Pixel 3's construction is noticeably lighter and notably thinner than the Moto G60, although it was released many years before. The Google Pixel 3 has a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density.
Google Pixel 3 features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G60. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G60 counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto G60 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
The Moto G60 counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 106% more battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G60 shoots greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto G60 also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.