Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-04-27 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than Moto G60's 79.5 score. These phones come with Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Moto G60 has Android 11 version. LG V30S ThinQ's body is way lighter and incredibly thinner than Moto G60, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a higher pixels density. The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better processor than Moto G60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Moto G60 features a way better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G60 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G60, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto G60 counts with a superior battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has an 82% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.