Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Sonic silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G60 is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, having a 79.5 score against 76.2. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Moto G60 is a just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone than nubia Red Magic 5S. These phones work with Android OS, but Moto G60 has newer 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, providing some additional features and increased performance.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G60, although it has a little bit smaller display, a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution. Moto G60 has much more storage capacity for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little bit better performance than Moto G60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little bit better camera than Moto G60, because although it has a camera in the back with way less MP, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations.
The Motorola Moto G60 counts with improved battery duration than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.