Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G60, getting a 79.9 score against 79.5. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a more recent 14 version while Motorola Moto G60 has Android 11, providing you a couple nice extra features and improved performance. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a notably newer device, and it's also somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Moto G60.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features just a bit better looking display than Moto G60, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels number per display inch. The Galaxy A25 5G has a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G60, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB, the Galaxy A25 5G also has 128 GB internal memory.
Moto G60 has a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Moto G60 counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy A25 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity. Moto G60 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G60 also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.