Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-04-27 | -- |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 7.94 ounces | -- |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 has an overall score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than Moto G60's 79.5 general score. The Galaxy A34 is a thinner and noticeably lighter cellphone than Moto G60. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A34 has 13 version and Moto G60 has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy A34 features a little bit better display than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel quantity in each inch of display. Galaxy A34 features a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G60. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Moto G60 features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A34, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G60 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Moto G60 captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A34, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera.
Moto G60 has longer battery life than Galaxy A34, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.