Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-27 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Moto G60, having an 83.8 score against 79.5. Galaxy A50's body is a lot thinner and notably lighter than the Moto G60, even though it was released many years before. The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G60, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G60, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a processor that is very similar to the Moto G60 one, both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G60 features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Moto G60 captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back camera with a way better 108 megapixels resolution and a much better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.