Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is better than Motorola Moto G60, getting a 90.8 score against 79.5. The Galaxy A51 5G is an older cellphone than Motorola Moto G60, but Samsung managed to make it lighter and thinner anyway. These phones have the same Android 11 OS, so both should offer identical OS features. Galaxy A51 5G features a little bit better screen than Moto G60, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features more storage capacity for apps and games than Moto G60, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows 24 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's CPU is very similar to the CPU in Motorola Moto G60, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has 2 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Moto G60 has a bit better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G60 also has a much better 108 MP resolution back facing camera and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos. Motorola Moto G60 features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 33% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.