Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G60's score of 79.5. The Galaxy A52 5G body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola Moto G60, even when both of them were only released 1 months apart. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Motorola Moto G60 has Android 11 version, counting with some additional features and enhanced performance.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's processing unit is just as good as the Motorola Moto G60 one, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy A52 5G has a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher display pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's camera is very similar to Motorola Moto G60's camera, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a worse video quality and a camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and videos. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G60, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 128 GB internal storage.
Motorola Moto G60 has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.