Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is much better than Moto G60's 79.5 general score. Galaxy A52s's design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Moto G60, even though both of them were released with only 4 months difference. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should provide all the same OS features.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher screen pixel density. The Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A52s's camera is just as good as Motorola Moto G60's camera, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a back-facing camera with much less megapixels resolution and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Moto G60, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has 64 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Moto G60 features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.