Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is better than Moto G60's general score of 79.5. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version while Moto G60 has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Moto G60, even though it was released around 10 months before.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit sharper display than Moto G60, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little inferior number of pixels per inch in the display and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit better CPU than Moto G60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G60, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Moto G60 has greater battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 33% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto G60, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a back camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.