Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-27 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) is a little bit better than the Moto G60, getting an 85.2 score against 79.5. The Galaxy A9 (2018) construction is a lot thinner and lighter than Moto G60, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Motorola Moto G60 and Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) both count with extremely similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) and Motorola Moto G60 count with quite similar displays, although the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a quite worse display pixels density, a quite smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2220 resolution. Motorola Moto G60 features a better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs and video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G60 also counts with a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit more memory for games and applications than Moto G60, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Moto G60 features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.