Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-27 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is much better than Moto G60's 79.5 global score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Fold is older and somewhat heavier than Moto G60, it's body is still noticeably thinner. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Moto G60 has Android 11 version, providing the user some additional features.
The Galaxy Fold features a bit better hardware performance than Moto G60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Fold has a display that's just as good as the Moto G60 one, because although the Galaxy Fold has a quite lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1536 x 2152px and a little bigger display.
Motorola Moto G60 takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower video frame rates and a much smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G60 also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera.
The Galaxy Fold has much more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G60 has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 37 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.