Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-27 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is better than the Moto G60, with a 90.8 score against 79.5. Although Galaxy Note 20 and the Moto G60 were released only a couple months apart, Galaxy Note 20 is somewhat lighter and thinner. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto G60, although it has a bit worse display pixels density, a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G60, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Moto G60 has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Moto G60 features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Moto G60 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G60 also counts with a camera with much more megapixels and better video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.