Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G60's 79.5 general score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Motorola Moto G60 has Android 11 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a thinner and a little lighter device than Motorola Moto G60, although they were released only 8 months apart.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit superior CPU than Moto G60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto G60, because it has a greater pixels density, a little bit larger display and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much clearer photos and videos than Moto G60, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger aperture and a lot better video quality. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory.
Moto G60 has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.