Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 7.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than the Moto G60, getting an 81.2 score against 79.5. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while Moto G60 has Android 11 version. Galaxy Note 3's design is a lot lighter and thinner than the Moto G60, even though it was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3's CPU is just as good as Motorola Moto G60's processing unit, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has 1 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra GPU. The Galaxy Note 3 has a better looking screen than Moto G60, although it has a just a little lower amount of pixels per inch of screen, a quite smaller screen and a little lower 1920 x 1080px resolution.
The Motorola Moto G60 features much more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G60 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Moto G60 has a lot better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G60 also has a larger aperture for better photos in low light situations and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Moto G60 has a way better battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.