Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G60 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, with a 79.5 score against 79.3. Moto G60's design is way newer than Samsung Galaxy Note 5's, but it is incredibly heavier and notably thicker. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Moto G60 has newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1.
Moto G60 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G60 also has a higher number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a brighter display than Moto G60, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels amount in each inch in the display and a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Motorola Moto G60 has a much better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G60 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G60 has a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G60 has a lot better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G60 also has a back facing camera with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.