Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-27 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G60's 79.5 global score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is way older than the Motorola Moto G60, it's body is lighter and much thinner. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little sharper display than Moto G60, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Moto G60 counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G60 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's processor is just as good as Moto G60's CPU, they have 8 cpu cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Moto G60 has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Moto G60 also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Moto G60 has a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.