Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-27 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G60, with a general score of 80.2 against 79.5. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note5 is notably older than Motorola Moto G60, it's construction is incredibly lighter and incredibly thinner. The Galaxy Note5 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Moto G60, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixels density.
Motorola Moto G60 features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Moto G60 features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G60 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G60 has a way better battery life than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity. Moto G60 takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same size camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G60 also has a camera with a way better 108 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.