Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-27 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 is a bit better than Moto G60, getting an 83 score against 79.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note8 is noticeably older than Moto G60, it's design is lighter and somewhat thinner. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note8 has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Moto G60 has Android 11.
The Galaxy Note8 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G60, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note8 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Note8 counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G60, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel number per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Motorola Moto G60 features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G60 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Moto G60 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G60 also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera.
Motorola Moto G60 has a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.