Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-27 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is much better than Moto G60, with an 88.3 score against 79.5. Both phones in this review come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should provide the user very similar operating system features. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S10 is notably older than the Moto G60, it's design is lighter and way thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a greater pixels density. Galaxy S10 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola Moto G60 features a much better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a lot tinier aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto G60 also counts with a lot higher 108 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G60, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Moto G60 has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.