Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-27 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is better than Motorola Moto G60, with an 89.7 score against 79.5. The Galaxy S10 Lite body is somewhat thinner and lighter than Motorola Moto G60, although it was released just 15 months before. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a little sharper screen than Moto G60, although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bit smaller screen and a just a little less pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G60, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G60, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
Moto G60 features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Moto G60 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto G60 also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.