Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-27 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is a bit better than Moto G60, having a score of 86.3 against 79.5. Even though the Galaxy S10e is way older than Moto G60, it's construction is incredibly thinner and notably lighter. Galaxy S10e has a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher number of pixels in each inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G60, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 2 GB more RAM. Moto G60 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G60 also counts with a camera with a way better 108 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Moto G60 has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.