Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is better than the Motorola Moto G60's global score of 79.5. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version while Motorola Moto G60 has Android 11 version, providing you a couple nice extra features. Despite of the fact that Galaxy S20 is older than the Motorola Moto G60, it's body is much thinner and a lot lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 features a brighter screen than Moto G60, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a better pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G60, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Moto G60 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G60 also counts with higher 30 fps video frame rates and a camera in the back with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto G60 has a way better battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.