Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than Moto G60's overall score of 79.5. The Galaxy S20 FE is a thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Moto G60, even when both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Both devices in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 operating system.
Galaxy S20 FE has just a little better performance than Moto G60, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 FE also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto G60, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G60 has superior battery duration than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Motorola Moto G60 shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto G60 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.