Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Moto G60, having a score of 98 against 79.5. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older device than the Moto G60, but it's a bit lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and Moto G60 has Android 11, offering a couple nice extra features and some performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G60, because it has a better pixels density, a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution and a quite bigger screen. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Moto G60, because although it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Moto G60, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Moto G60 has superior battery life than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G60, and although they both have a 108 mega pixels resolution camera, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture and a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.