Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than Motorola Moto G60, with a overall score of 95.4 against 79.5. Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is just a little bit heavier than the Motorola Moto G60, it's somewhat thinner and also newer. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Motorola Moto G60 has Android 11, so it offers a couple additional features and performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with an incredibly better looking display than Moto G60, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Moto G60 counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G60, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than Moto G60, and although they both have a 108 megapixels camera, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger aperture and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Moto G60 counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.