Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-27 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G60 has a general score of 79.5, which is a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. Motorola Moto G60 is a heavier device than the Galaxy S7 Active, but they are equally thin. The Moto G60 features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Moto G60 also has a higher number of cores.
Galaxy S7 Active has a much better display than Moto G60, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Moto G60 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Moto G60 also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Motorola Moto G60 features a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB and 64 GB internal storage. Motorola Moto G60 counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.