Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-27 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 Active has a global score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Moto G60's global score of 79.5. The Galaxy S8 Active design has the same thickness than the Moto G60, but it is just a bit lighter. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a CPU that's just as good as the processing unit in Moto G60, both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy S8 Active has a brighter display than Moto G60, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a greater amount of pixels per display inch. The Moto G60 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Moto G60 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Motorola Moto G60 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G60 also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Moto G60 has a way better battery life than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.