Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-27 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is a little bit better than the Moto G60's 79.5 global score. Galaxy S9 is an notably older phone than the Moto G60, but Samsung managed to build it extremely lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a sharper screen than Moto G60, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels amount in each inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Moto G60 features a bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G60 also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G60. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Moto G60 has a superior camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a much tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting images and/or video in low-light environments and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G60 also counts with a camera with much more MP.
The Moto G60 has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.