Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-04-27 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G60's global score of 79.5. Although it's the best we compare here, Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an older, much thicker and heavier phone than the Motorola Moto G60. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Moto G60 has Android 11, providing the user a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little better performance than Motorola Moto G60. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better screen than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater display pixel density.
Moto G60 has more memory for apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto G60 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G60 has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Moto G60 captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.