Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than Moto G60, getting an 81 score against 79.5. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a a little lighter device than Moto G60, but both of them are 0.39inches thick. These devices come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G60, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density. The Galaxy XCover Pro's processor is very similar to the CPU in Moto G60, they have a 4 GB RAM and 8 processing cores.
The Moto G60 counts with a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto G60 also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G60 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and video in low light situations, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition and a way more megapixels back camera.
Motorola Moto G60 features a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 48 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.