Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is much better than the Moto G60's general score of 79.5. These phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and Moto G60 has Android 11, providing the user some extra features. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's design is thinner and lighter than Moto G60, even though it was released just a little further than a year before.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better display than Moto G60, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Motorola Moto G60 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto G60 also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G60, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Moto G60 features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.