Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than Motorola Moto G60's 79.5 global score. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 11 operating system. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner cellphone than the Motorola Moto G60, although both were released only 9 months apart.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a little higher pixel amount per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little better hardware performance than Moto G60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Moto G60 has a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light images and videos and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G60 also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Motorola Moto G60 counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.